Follow Us:

All CESTAT

CESTAT allows two day delay in filing appeal due to calculation error

April 3, 2022 771 Views 0 comment Print

Dow International Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) The Appellant is in Appeal against impugned Order-in-Appeal whereby, the Commissioner (Appeals) have rejected the Appeal on the ground of limitation. It has been observed in the impugned order that although the Appellant had filed an application of condonation of delay but have not given […]

Assessee entitled to claim refund of service tax paid under RCM after 30.06.2017

March 31, 2022 2733 Views 0 comment Print

Indo Tooling Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT finds that payment of service tax including the cess relating to the period prior to 30.06.2017, paid in the year 2018 during the GST regime, amounts to payment in accordance with law as the same has been paid on the insistence […]

Preparation of fake TR-6 challans of Custom Duty Payment- CESTAT upheld Penalties

March 30, 2022 6519 Views 0 comment Print

Pawan Kumar Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chandigarh) The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the penalties have been imposed under section 112 (a) and section 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 for alleged preparation of fake TR-6 challans showing payment of customs duty which actually was not paid by the appellant. Ld. […]

No prohibition under Rule 9 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 on issue of two registration certificates for one and same premises

March 28, 2022 1317 Views 0 comment Print

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd (CESTAT Mumbai) First and foremost point to be considered is that whether Rule 9 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 prohibits issue of two registration certificates for one and the same premises that formed the basis of the adjudication order? On a bare reading of Rule […]

Prices of transacted goods can be determined only on transaction date

March 28, 2022 627 Views 0 comment Print

Viraj Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (I) (CESTAT Mumbai) It is settled principle of the commercial transactions that the prices of the transacted goods can be determined only on the date of transaction and not on any other date whether previous or subsequent. The prices may fluctuate on account of the vagaries of […]

CESTAT allows Cenvat credit on maintenance & repair work of residential colony

March 28, 2022 831 Views 0 comment Print

Mangalam Cement Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Central Excise & CGST (CESTAT Delhi) Appeal is filed against denial of cenvat credit of service tax taken by the appellant on maintenance and repair work of their residential colony on the ground that the said service has no nexus with the manufacture of final product. Rule 2(l) of Cenvat […]

Customs Broker cannot use IEC of others without their knowledge for import by his client

March 28, 2022 2832 Views 0 comment Print

Falcon India (Customs Broker) Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) Regulation 10 (n) of CBLR 2018 (read with erstwhile Regulation 11(n) of CBLR, 2013) requires the Customs Broker to verify correctness of Importer Exporter Code (IEC) number, Goods and Services Tax Identification Number (GSTIN),identity of his client and functioning of his client at the declared […]

Section 11B time limitation for claiming refund not applies to ‘deposit’ in PLA

March 28, 2022 1614 Views 0 comment Print

Marketing Communication and Advertising Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) Section 11B prescribes time limitation for claiming refund of duty & interest, if any, paid. In the Order-in-Original, even though Appellate Authority observed that the appellant filed a refund claim of Rs. 20,38,157/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs Thirty Eight Thousand One Hundred and Fifty […]

Small mismatch in case of large variety of goods cannot be treated as deliberate

March 28, 2022 3216 Views 0 comment Print

Rubal International Vs Commissioner of Customs (ICD, TKD) (CESTAT Delhi) I find that only few goods were found to be mismatch with the invoice and packing list. I further find that the appellant had given cogent explanation based on the statement and clarification of the shipper, via E-mail, clarifying that due to a large variety […]

Service Tax Refund cannot be denied merely because FIRC contains address of HO instead of place where service was availed

March 27, 2022 4341 Views 1 comment Print

HID India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) In this case refund of the unutilized cenvat credit was rejected holding that; firstly, the input services were received prior to obtaining the service tax registration from the Department; secondly, the invoices show the address of their Head office at Bangalore and […]

Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930