CESTAT Chennai quashes Rs. 25,000 penalty on Gayrams Shipping Services due to absence of mens rea. Detailed analysis of the case and legal implications.
CESTAT Mumbai rules trade discount to bulk buyer of CNG not liable for excise duty. Detailed analysis of Mahanagar Gas Ltd. vs Commissioner case.
Read the detailed analysis of Rattha Holding Company Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai). CESTAT ruling clarifies no service tax on properties rented out for accommodation and related activities.
xplore the case of Shakti Cargo Movers vs. Commissioner of Customs at CESTAT Delhi, where the court ruled that a customs broker cannot be held responsible if a client fails to inform authorities of an address change.
Understand the case of Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs Commissioner regarding shampoo sachet assessable value under Central Excise Act.
Dive into the customs duty exemption dispute between Halbit Avionics Pvt Ltd and the Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore). Detailed analysis of imports for aircraft upgradation and eligibility for duty exemption.
Read the full text of the CESTAT Chennai order on the classification of Sweet Pearl P200 containing 99% Maltitol Crystals. Analysis, conclusion, and consequential benefits discussed.
CESTAT Bangalore’s ruling emphasizes customs adherence to DGFT notifications. In Specta Decor Pvt Limited vs. Commissioner of Customs case, a redemption fine is reduced due to unforeseen circumstances.
In the case of Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Customs, CESTAT Chennai allows re-credit of customs duty in advance authorisation scrips.
Hindustan Distributors Vs Commissioner of Customs case analysis. CESTAT Chandigarh quashes redemption fine and penalty on prime pre-painted steel coils.
