In re Srisai Luxurious Stay LLP (GST AAR Karnataka) 1. Whether the daily accommodation services ranging from Rs.300 to Rs.500 per bed are eligible for exemption under Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax? The daily accommodation services ranging from Rs.300 to 500 per bed are eligible for exemption under Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 2. […]
In re New Space India Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) 1) Whether Leasing of Satellite Transponder which is covered under SAC Code 997319 be charged at 5% GST as per HSN Code 8803 – Parts Goods of Heading 8802 (Satellites)? The service of Leasing of Satellite Transponders, covered under SAC 9973 19, falls under the Entry No. […]
In the instant case, the applicant intends to supply goods or services or both from their principle place of business, which is located in Rajasthan. The applicant has only one principle place of business, for which registration has been obtained and does not have any other fixed establishment other than the principle place of business, as admitted by the applicant. Therefore the location of the supplier is nothing but the principle place of business which is in Rajasthan. Thus there is no requirement for a separate registration in Karnataka for execution of the contract referred supra.
The contract of the applicant group with the Company is verified and found that what is given is an immovable property consisting of only rooms with attache toilets as per the Layout of the leased premises annexed to the Lease agreement and does not fit into the meaning of a dwelling which means a house.
The amount of assistance received by the farmer or on account of the farmer from the Government Department has no bearing on the price and hence on the value of supply made by the applicant to the farmer and is not covered under section 15(2)(e) of the CGST Act, 2017.
In re Attica Gold Pvt. Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) a) Whether applicant dealing in second hand goods and tax is to be paid on the difference between the selling price and purchase price as stipulated in Rule 32(5) of CGST Rules, 2017 if dealer purchases used / second hand gold jewellery from individuals who are […]
In re C. Ramappa (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether letting out the residential dwelling to a firm results in supply of service? An opportunity of hearing was given to the applicant on 03.2020 and Sri Rajesh Kumar T R, Chartered Accountant & duly authorised representative of the applicant appeared for the said hearing & reiterated the […]
In re NMDC Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) The applicant filed the instant application, for rectification of ruling, alleging that the authority has not ruled in the order as to whether the contributions towards DMF & NMET amount to supply in terms of Section 7 of the CGST Act 2017 or not and also the authority […]
In re NMDC Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) It is clearly evident from the aforesaid AAR Order that the authority has considered all the submissions and issued the proper order. Hence there is no error / apparent mistake on the face of the record, in the said order and hence the instant application is not valid […]
In re Tata Coffee Limited (GST AAAR Karnataka) Wooden supply to Government Auction Department is supply as agent In this case the Depots are set up by the State Government in terms of Section 104-A(5) of the Karnataka Forest Act for the purchase and sale of timber since the Act mandates that timber can only […]
