This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
PML Act: Section 24 Presumption can be Rebutted only at Trial Stage
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kumar Pranav Vs The State through Enforcement of Directorate (Jharkhand High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Jharkhand High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Kumar Pranav Vs State through Enforcement of Directorate (Jharkhand High Court)
Jharkhand High Court dismissed the appeal of Kumar Pranav against the rejection of his discharge petition in a money laundering case. The court held that the presumption under Section 24 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act can only be rebutted during the trial stage and not at the stage of framing charges.
High Court further held that Nexus if any, between the properties acquired in the name of this petitioner and the proceeds of crime is a question of fact to be looked into at the stage of t...
