Case Law Details
Manohar Rawat Vs Laerdal Medical Private Limited (Competition Commission of India)
Mr. Manohar Rawat filed an information with the Competition Commission of India (CCI), alleging cartelization under Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002, against Laerdal Medical Private Ltd. (OP-1), Adison Equipment Company (OP-2), Tulips Global (OP-3), and Shreya Enterprises (OP-4). The allegation stemmed from Tender No. Gem/2023/B/3149411 floated by the Government Medical College, Haldawani, Uttarakhand.
Analysis: Mr. Rawat accused the aforementioned parties of colluding in the tender process. He claimed that OP-2 and OP-4 quoted on behalf of OP-1, with supporting authority letters. Additionally, he alleged a connection between OP-2 and OP-3. Mr. Rawat provided various documents, including purchase orders and certificates, to substantiate his claims.
However, upon review, the CCI found the evidence insufficient to establish collusion or cartelization. The documents presented failed to convincingly demonstrate wrongdoing. The CCI noted discrepancies but concluded they did not indicate bid rigging or collusive behavior, as per the Act’s provisions.
Conclusion: The CCI, after careful consideration, dismissed the case under Section 26(2) of the Act due to the lack of evidence supporting the allegations. The commission found no grounds for further investigation. The secretary was directed to inform Mr. Rawat accordingly.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
