Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : Article analyses the IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026, covering creditor-driven reforms, CIIRP, liquidation, avoidance actions and cross-...
Corporate Law : A detailed guide to LLP incorporation covering RUN-LLP, Form FILLIP, Form LLP-3, required documents, CRC approval and post-incorpo...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC quashed demolition proceedings, adopted Supreme Court directions, and issued further directions governing demolition ...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC examined criminal cases against advocates, Bar Council processes, verification issues, and issued compliance directio...
Corporate Law : Explains extra-judicial killings, constitutional and statutory provisions, Supreme Court guidelines and the legal framework govern...
Corporate Law : Government outlines FTAs, Export Promotion Mission, e-commerce export reforms and logistics initiatives to diversify export market...
Corporate Law : Finance Ministry states ED is investigating under PMLA, has attached ₹68.09 crore in properties and shared information with Biha...
Corporate Law : Finance Ministry outlines CBDT e-Filing portal upgrades, peak filing readiness and contractual penalties imposed on the Managed Se...
Corporate Law : CCPA begins action against 41 restaurants over default service charges, citing consumer complaints, 2022 Guidelines and the Consum...
Corporate Law : CBI filed its 16th chargesheet in a homebuyers fraud investigation alleging conspiracy, cheating and criminal breach of trust invo...
Corporate Law : CCPA ordered removal of default service charge from billing software, imposed a ₹30,000 penalty, and directed compliance within ...
Corporate Law : CCPA directed immediate discontinuation of service charge, noting the restaurant stopped the practice after the Delhi HC judgment ...
Corporate Law : CCPA imposed a ₹10 lakh penalty for misleading walkie-talkie listings lacking mandatory disclosures and directed future complian...
Corporate Law : CCPA imposed a ₹1 lakh penalty for misleading walkie-talkie advertisements lacking mandatory regulatory disclosures and directed...
Corporate Law : CCI closed proceedings after finding no prima facie evidence of input foreclosure, denial of market access, or abuse of dominance ...
Corporate Law : Bill introduced in Lok Sabha proposes increasing Supreme Court Judges from 33 to 37, replacing the 2026 Ordinance with retrospecti...
Corporate Law : BCI directs State Bar Councils and law colleges to immediately implement its Circular on social media conduct, digital ethics and ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an Insolvency Professional's registration over CIRP compliance lapses, disclosure failures and Code violations in t...
Corporate Law : FSSAI amends the notified food laboratory list, updating accredited laboratories, registrations and scopes across multiple States ...
Corporate Law : PFRDA notifies Regulatory Sandbox Regulations, 2026 enabling controlled testing with limited relaxations while protecting subscrib...
Explore impact of Jan Vishwas Act 2023 on Legal Metrology Act, 2009. Discover revised penalties and its role in promoting ease of doing business.
Discover how beneficiaries play a crucial role in maximizing impact of CSR initiatives. Learn about their responsibilities and benefits of active participation
In present facts of the case, the Revision Petition was filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which assails order dated 06.02.2015 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.
In present facts of the case, the revision petition was filed under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 assailing the order dated 11.08.2017 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Pandri, Raipur.
In present facts of the case, it was held that findings of State Commission that the patient and his family members were not informed about the risk nor their consent was obtained, do not suffer from any illegality as procedure/risk was explained to the patient.
In present facts of the case, the Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents under section 21 (b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 14.12.2017 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’).
In present facts of the case, the NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI (NCDRC) have refused to condone the delay for 125 days as no ‘sufficient cause’ was shown because there was difference in oral submissions and the contents of the Application submitted.
In present facts of the case, the Complaint of the patient was dismissed and it was observed that it is natural that if any patient consults with a doctor, then he would inform about all alternative modes of treatment.
In present facts of the case, the NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION (NCDRC) have allowed the Revision Petition in favour of the Complainant as medical negligence of the doctor was established as the Complainant was able to discharge its initial burden of proof.
In present facts of the case, the NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION (NCDRC) allowed the Revision Petition on the basis of ‘medical negligence’ as the Government Guidelines issued by Ministry of Health pertaining to Swine Flu was not followed properly which have resulted into death of the patient.
