The Government of West Bengal notified West Bengal Industrial Promotion Assistance to Industrial Enterprises (scheme) with effect from 01.01.2010 with the object to encourage manufacturing goods in West Bengal and to take care of the financial needs for expansion of their capacity, modernization and improving their marketing capabilities.
HC set aside the show cause notices on the ground that writ court can interfere if the show cause notice is an order by itself and not a show cause notice and it is pre-meditated then the Courts are entitled to interfere with the said order.
ACIT Vs LGW Industries Limited & ors. (Calcutta High Court) Hon’ble Division Bench of Calcutta high Court has dismissed the appeal of the department vide its judgment dated 16th September, 2022 in a dispute relating to denial of Input Tax credit due to cancellation of registration of supplier of goods with retrospective effect. Hon’ble single […]
Duty drawback & IGST/unutilized ITC refund of exporters are withheld by department without assigning reasons & tagging as Risky Exporter
SC will hear issue of constitutional validity of Section 17(5)(d) of CGST Act, which does not allow input tax credit on immovable property
Nexage Innovations Vs Deputy Commissioner of Customs & ors. (Calcutta High Court) Calcutta High Court directs removal of Risky exporter tag and allows refund of duty drawback and IGST claim Hon’ble Division Bench of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the matter M/s. Nexage Innovations Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Customs & Ors M.A.T. 916 of […]
Sailesh Chandra Dutta Vs Assistant Commissioner (Calcutta High Court) Calcutta High Court quashes garnishee proceedings and original assessment order passed in violation of natural justice against which no appeal preferred Hon’ble Division Bench of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the matter Sailesh Chandra Dutta Vs. Assistant Commissioner, Raiganj Charge, Raiganj & Ors M.A.T. 1062 […]
The attachment of the overdraft bank account was done by way of initiation of garnishee proceedings as a sequel to an order of assessment which had attained finality as the appeal against such assessment order was filed before the wrong forum and mandatory pre deposit for the purpose of filing of the appeal was also not made.
The common but most important feature in all these cases was that the entitlement of the writ petitioners to the input credit had crystallized. This crystallized right, which had ripened into the vested right, was being denied on account of procedural problem.
HC directed the respondents to open the portal to file, revise or re-revise TRAN 1 return, if it is possible or feasible.
