The High Court held that firing at accused persons during encounters without following mandatory procedures is impermissible. Non-compliance with FIR registration and independent investigation norms was strongly criticised.
The Court clarified that abetment requires proof of the accused’s intention to instigate suicide. Angry words spoken in a quarrel, without mens rea, do not meet the threshold.
The High Court ordered a judicial inquiry after finding the State’s death audit on a water contamination incident vague and unsupported, stressing accountability and public health safeguards.
Karnataka HC quashed FIR against advocate, holding adult relationship was consensual; false promise of marriage alone can’t constitute rape under law.
The article highlights how High Court Benches are unevenly allotted across States, leaving large regions without accessible courts. It underscores how this disparity undermines equality and access to justice.
The court held that advocates cannot be compelled to disclose how they obtained documents filed for clients, reaffirming attorney–client privilege under evidence law.
The High Court’s leadership change marks a milestone for women in the judiciary. The appointment reflects institutional commitment to inclusivity and constitutional values.
SC held that disciplinary action cannot be taken against judges solely for alleged errors in judicial orders. Ruling underscores that independence and fearlessness of trial judges are vital to rule of law.
The issue was whether prosecution proved cruelty and abetment beyond doubt. The Court ruled that unspecified demands and inconsistent testimony cannot sustain guilt.
Repeated racial attacks and the absence of a specific law expose a constitutional gap, prompting calls for urgent legislation to protect citizens from racial violence.
