L S Cable and System Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) 1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent no.2 to issue refund determined vide assessment order dated 29th November, 2019 under Section 143(3) of the […]
CIT Vs Tweezerman (India) Pvt. Ltd. (Madras High Court) The short question involved in the instant case is as how to compute the total turnover while considering the claim for exemption under Section 10B of the Act. The assessee is engaged in the manufacture of certain articles which are being exported and during the manufacturing […]
SEBI inter alia prescribed the position limits in permitted currency pairs. Based on feedback received from Stock Exchanges/ Clearing Corporations and upon a review of the same, it has been decided to revise the client level position limits, per stock exchange, as follows:
In re Educational Initiative Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Gujarat) In view of the foregoing discussion, we allow the appeal filed by the department, modify the Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/27/2020 dated 02.07.2020 of the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling and hold that ASSET (Assessment of Scholastic Skills through Educational Testing – with its variants) conducted by […]
Case No. AD-MTR-11/2020 Termination of Mid-Term Review limited to change of name of producer/exporter from Korea RP in the anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of Aluminium and Zinc coated flat products originating in or exported from China PR, Vietnam and Korea RP
CIT Vs Wheels India Limited (Madras High Court) After hearing the submissions of the auhorized representative of the assessee, the CIT(A) perused the copies of the agreement and on facts, found that the amounts paid by the assessee were sales commission and marketing services to nonresident agents outside India for their services rendered outside India […]
ITO Vs Braitrim India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) Admittedly, as the remittances made by the asessee before us, viz. BIPL to M/s Braitrim UK Ltd. had been held to have been made towards reimbursement of expenses (without any mark-up), therefore, in the absence of any income element chargeable to tax in the hands of the […]
Suraj Pulses Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) We find that as far as the reasons recorded, though there is a specific mention about amount of 20,50,000/- received by way of accommodation entry, however neither there is any mention from whom the assessee had received the amount nor what is the nature of the entry […]
Commissioner of Customs Vs India Land and Properties Limited (CESTAT Chennai) exemption notifications must be interpreted strictly and if the case does not fall within the parameters, the benefit cannot be given. Any benefit of doubt must be given to the Revenue and should be decided against the appellant. Once the threshold of applicability of […]
Based on our records we wish to clarify, that the said Ashish Tayal is not a Chartered Accountant and it has been wrongly reported that he is a Chartered Accountant in the said news item. By attributing such a fraud wrongly to a Chartered Accountant you have brought immense disrepute to the profession of Chartered Accountancy and tarnished their image in the eyes of the public.
