Amendment to the Notification No. 40/2015-Customs dated 21.07.2015 to substitute the name of M/s International Institute of Diamond Grading & Research India Pvt Ltd by M/s De Beers India Pvt Ltd MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS) New Delhi, the 6th April, 2022 Notification No. 20/2022 – Customs […]
Uniqueness of identity of the Applicant, established through a de-duplication process is the most important feature of Aadhaar. It was seen that UIDAI had to cancel more than 4.75 lakh Aadhaars (November 2019) for being duplicate. There were instances of issue of Aadhaars with the same biometric data to different residents indicating flaws in the de-duplication process and issue of Aadhaars on faulty biometrics and documents.
References/representations have been received in this Department mentioning that Pension of deceased pensioners is not often revised based on recommendation of Pay Commission etc and arrears of pension in respect of deceased pensioner are not paid by the Pension Disbursing Bank to the nominee.
All concerned are hereby directed not to detain or issue any Show Cause Notice to the goods under transport or stored in parcel agencies, raising the sole reason for undervaluation of the goods compared to the Maximum Retail Price (MRP).
Porteck India Info Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax & Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT finds that the action of the Asstt. Commissioner, of issuing of fresh show cause notice, instead of granting refund, in terms of Final Order of this Tribunal amounts to interference in the justice delivery system. […]
The applicant in spite of being a Tax consultant, he has deliberately indulged in the issuance of fake invoices to pass the illegal Input Tax Credit to the endusers and thus defrauded the Govt. Exchequer from its huge legitimate GST revenue.
Sree Constructions Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Andhra Pradesh High Court) Sub- Section (4) of Section 75 of CGST Act, reads as under:- ‘An opportunity of hearing shall be granted where a request is received in writing from the person chargeable with tax or penalty, or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person.’ It […]
Vishal Ashwin Patel Vs ACIT (Supreme Court of India) We have gone through the respective orders passed by the High Court dismissing the writ petitions. Having gone through the orders passed by the High Court dismissing the writ petitions, it can be seen that the said orders are cryptic, nonspeaking and nonreasoned orders. From the […]
Gaurav Controct Co. Through Hiralal Shivgan Dholu Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre (Gujarat High Court) The subject matter of challenge is the legality and validity of the assessment order dated 30.07.2021 passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the A.Y. 2018-19. It appears […]
Tata Teleservices Limited Vs CIT (Delhi High Court) HC is of the view that the requirement of payment of twenty percent of disputed tax demand is not a pre-requisite for putting in abeyance recovery of demand pending first appeal in all cases. The said pre-condition of deposit of twenty percent of the demand can be […]
