The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has notified a new Rule 12AC and a new Form ITR-U which shall be required to be filed along with the respective ITR, to furnish an updated return
CESTAT held that Composition Scheme cannot be denied to the appellants merely on the ground of discharge of service tax under different Head prior to 01.06.2007.
ITAT held that mere disallowance of depreciation would not lead to imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) , more particularly where quantum disallowance of depreciation itself is highly debatable
No mala fide can be inferred where assessee is nursing such huge losses at its disposal. ITAT find that mitigating circumstances exists to exonerate assessee from clutches of penalty under Section 271(1)(b)
ITAT Delhi held that Reopening not allowable to disallow prior period expenses which were duly disclosed during original Assessment in Financial Statements and Tax Audit report
Commercial Taxes Department has identified 3.26 lakh dealers as not having paid a single rupee as GST during the year 2021-2022. Similarly, about 1.94 lakh dealers have paid less than Rs.1000 as GST for the entire year.
Tvl. Kumaran Filaments (P) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise (Madras High Court) Insofar as the due of interest is concerned, the factual matrix is that, the entire amount of Rs.50,21,080/- was very much available in the credit of the petitioner for the whole period, therefore, if at all, the same is […]
CIT(A) and ITAT have set aside the assessment order on the ground that Rs.19 crore cannot be added as additional income of the Trust since exemption on corpus donation is allowed on purchase of land, as it is a purchase of capital asset.
Marriott International Inc Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The only issue involved in this appeal is that income of royalty arising out of the above trademark of ‘brand’ Marriott’ is taxable in the hands of the assessee or not. Now, assessee has given a registration certificate dated 21st august, 2006 and covers above assessment years. No […]
Goldman Sachs Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Admittedly, the assessee deducted tax at source u/s.192 of the Act, on the 100% salary paid to the seconded employees, and paid the same to the credit of the Central Government. The assessee only reimbursed part of the salary cost of the seconded employee to overseas […]
