01 Agency is notified as PSIAs alongwith their approved equipments. Additional areas of operation in respect of 02 existing PSIAs and additional instruments in respect of 03 existing PSIAs have also been notified. Government of India Ministry of Commerce & Industry Department of Commerce Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi Public Notice No. 16/2015-2020 Dated the 24th […]
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India Date:24-06-2022 EXPOSURE DRAFT INSURANCE REGULATORY AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF INDIA STAFF (OFFICERS AND OTHER EMPLOYEES) (FIRST AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS, 2022 1. Taking into consideration the comments received on the exposure draft of IRDAI Staff (Officers and Other Employees) (First Amendment) Regulations, 2022 during internal consultation, the exposure draft of […]
HC held that under the Customs Act, 1962, there are different Power Centres for appointing persons as Officers of Customs for discharging their powers and functions (duties) imposed under the Act. The contours of powers to be exercised by such Officers of Customs is to be drawn by the Board.
Explore the case of Nitin Madhukar Rathi vs. DCIT at ITAT Pune involving unsecured loans and unexplained cash deposits. CIT(A) partially grants relief, but Rs. 38,00,000 addition confirmed.
The assessee has reqeusted to withdraw the appeal on the ground that with the introduction of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the appellant has decided to avail the Scheme with respect to the said appeal and therefore the appeal of the Assessee is required to be withdrawn in terms of scheme.
Explore the ITAT Chennai decision in Tristar Container Services case. Analysis of lease rental disallowance, treatment of containers as assets, and alternative depreciation claim.
Explore the Customs Classification dispute between E-Factor Adventure Tourism and Commissioner of Customs. Analysis of boat usage, registration, and the crucial CESTAT Chennai decision.
Explore the ITAT Mumbai decision in Abacus International Pte Ltd. vs. DDIT, where notional interest income on interest-free loans was assessed and its impact on penalty u/s. 271(1)(c).
The undisputed fact is that none appeared before the ld. CIT(A) who was convinced that the assessee did not want to pursue the appeal and, therefore, drew support from the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of B.N. Bhattachargee and Other [supra].
Sh. Samit Chakraborty Vs Cloudtail India Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Authority finds that the DGAP has correctly calculated the profiteered amount as Rs. 9,84,354/- (Rs. 5,37,208/- on closing stock & Rs. 4,47,146/- on fresh stock) as mentioned in Table-A above, which was to be passed on to the buyers of the impugned item by way […]
