Tariff Notification No. 14/2023-Customs (N.T.) Dated: 15.03.2023– Fixation of Tariff Value of Edible Oils, Brass Scrap, Areca Nut, Gold and Silver. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS) New Delhi Notification No. 14/2023-Customs (N.T.) Dated: 15th March, 2023 S.O. 1237(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of […]
These regulations maybe called the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Foreign Portfolio Investors) (Amendment) Regulations, 2023.
HC held that provisional attachment under section 83 of CGST Act 2017 cannot be extended & also there is no order extending the same.
It is seen that the Certificate from the Chartered Accountant is mandated under Para 3(i) of the Notification if the refund claim amount is more than 0.5% of the FOB value of the goods exported. Since legislative intention is not to export the taxes, I feel that an opportunity can be given to the Appellant to file the Chartered Accountant’s Certificate in terms of Para 3(i) of Notification No. 41/2012-S.T. dated 29/06/2012.
Merely because petitioner failed to submit grounds of appeal as an attachment at the time of filing its memo of appeal in Form No. 35, could not be a basis for appellate authority to pass order ex-parte especially when submissions sufficiently reflected the grounds on which order of assessment was being challenged in appeal proceedings.
The Hon’ble High Court was pleased to apply live link test i.e. the expression ‘reason to believe’, to denote reasons, which are based on tangible material and have a live link with the formation of the belief. Also, the Hon’ble High Court observed that blocking of electronic credit ledger is a drastic step, and therefore it was necessary for the concerned officer to have some material to form a belief that the conditions under Rule 86A of the Rules are satisfied.
Once there is no averment either in SCN or impugned orders regarding availment of benefits by suppression of fact or fraud, invoking extended period of limitation is not proper
Mohamed Mohideen Ayesha Nasreen Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) ITAT held that it could be seen that assessee is living with her husband and three children (Two daughters and one son) in USA. She has got married in the year 2003. In this letter, the assessee has submitted that approx. 1201 grams of jewellery belong to […]
Apex Court held that unjust enrichment not attracted where amount is deposited during investigation and pendency of appeal, as such deposits are under protest or in the nature of pre-deposit.
Malook Singh Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) CIT(A) held that cultivation of high quality foundation seeds of peas, wheat, paddy and potato is different from normal agricultural activity. Against this, the assessee has submitted all the bills & vouchers for expenses like lease rent, power bills, fertilizer, seeds, labour, wages and details of sale and mandi […]
