The recent ITAT ruling underlines that the deductions under sections 80IA/80IB should be subtracted from business profits when computing the deduction U/S. 80HHC. This is a comprehensive review of the case ITO vs Madhusudhan Industries.
Read about the Bombay High Court’s recent judgment in Kamlesh Kumar Mishra vs State of Maharashtra, allowing an advocate’s presence during interrogation under Section 70 of the Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.
Dive into the Delhi High Court’s decision in the case of Ohmi Industries Asia vs Assistant Commissioner, which paves the way for GST refunds on Market Research Services.
A detailed analysis of the ITAT Ahmedabad’s ruling in Bhutakia Bhimasar Vs PCIT, where it was held that a charitable organization should not lose tax exemption benefits due to technical lapses.
Understand the Bombay High Court’s ruling on PCIT vs Kimberly Clark Lever Private Limited case regarding the reference to TPO and the scrutiny assessment as per the Income Tax Act 1961.
Delhi High Court quashes a ₹10 crore tax demand, stating that an assessment order cannot be solely issued against one of the multiple legal heirs of a deceased taxpayer.
In a crucial verdict, the Bombay High Court allows BOCW cess refund to GE T and D India, emphasizing that supply contracts are outside the BOCW Cess Act’s purview.
The ITAT Indore supports the principle of natural justice by asking for re-adjudication of the case of R.M. Chemicals Private Limited vs DCIT due to insufficient opportunity provided to the assessee in the initial assessment.
In the case between Shital Ispat Pvt Ltd and C.C.-Jamnagar, CESTAT Ahmedabad orders re-consideration, stating the one-year period for filing a refund begins from the date of finalizing the bill of entry in instances of initial provisional assessment.
Explore the crucial CESTAT Ahmedabad judgment on Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T, casting a spotlight on the adherence to EXIM policy and implications for the pharmaceutical industry.
