Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
POONAM GANDHI

POONAM GANDHI

Contributing Author
Name: POONAM GANDHI Qualification: CA in Practice Location: AHMEDABAD, Gujarat, India Articles Published: 9,037 Total Views: 19,904,163
Articles by this Author
Income TaxInterest on refund not hit by proviso to section 244A(1)(aa) of the Income Tax Act: ITAT Ahmedabad
Income Tax

Interest on refund not hit by proviso to section 244A(1)(aa) of the Income Tax Act: ITAT Ahmedabad

POONAM GANDHI2 years ago
Income TaxSection 10(23C) Application Requires Re-examination Due to Lack of Material on Earlier Rejection: ITAT
Income Tax

Section 10(23C) Application Requires Re-examination Due to Lack of Material on Earlier Rejection: ITAT

POONAM GANDHI2 years ago
Goods and Services TaxPassing of ex-parte order before expiry of time limit for filing reply violative of principles of natural justice: Madras HC
Goods and Services Tax

Passing of ex-parte order before expiry of time limit for filing reply violative of principles of natural justice: Madras HC

POONAM GANDHI2 years ago
Goods and Services TaxImposition of penalty u/s. 129 of CGST Act for minor discrepancies unwarranted: Kerala HC
Goods and Services Tax

Imposition of penalty u/s. 129 of CGST Act for minor discrepancies unwarranted: Kerala HC

POONAM GANDHI2 years ago
Goods and Services TaxIssuance of summons u/s. 70 not deemed to be initiation of proceedings u/s. 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act
Goods and Services Tax

Issuance of summons u/s. 70 not deemed to be initiation of proceedings u/s. 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act

POONAM GANDHI2 years ago
Goods and Services TaxDenial of ITC on sole ground that GST ITC 02 was filed manually not justified: Bombay HC
Goods and Services Tax

Denial of ITC on sole ground that GST ITC 02 was filed manually not justified: Bombay HC

POONAM GANDHI2 years ago
Goods and Services TaxPenal liability u/s. 67 reduced for non-carrying requisite declaration in Form 8FA: Kerala HC
Goods and Services Tax

Penal liability u/s. 67 reduced for non-carrying requisite declaration in Form 8FA: Kerala HC

POONAM GANDHI2 years ago
Income TaxRevision order u/s. 263 sustained as assessment made without proper enquiry: ITAT Delhi
Income Tax

Revision order u/s. 263 sustained as assessment made without proper enquiry: ITAT Delhi

POONAM GANDHI2 years ago
Corporate LawEntertaining objection after confirmation of sale not justified as there is no allegation of fraud in e-auction: NCLT Mumbai
Corporate Law

Entertaining objection after confirmation of sale not justified as there is no allegation of fraud in e-auction: NCLT Mumbai

POONAM GANDHI2 years ago
Corporate LawCondonation rejected as time limit prescribed u/s. 61 of IBC not satisfied: NCLAT Chennai
Corporate Law

Condonation rejected as time limit prescribed u/s. 61 of IBC not satisfied: NCLAT Chennai

POONAM GANDHI2 years ago
Corporate LawConstruction of Dewas by-pass road is works contract hence tax leviable under Commercial & Entry Tax Act
Corporate Law

Construction of Dewas by-pass road is works contract hence tax leviable under Commercial & Entry Tax Act

POONAM GANDHI2 years ago
Income TaxReserve arising out of amalgamation is capital reserve and hence not taxable u/s. 28(iv): ITAT Mumbai
Income Tax

Reserve arising out of amalgamation is capital reserve and hence not taxable u/s. 28(iv): ITAT Mumbai

POONAM GANDHI2 years ago
Income TaxRevision order u/s. 263 quashed as order passed in original proceeding itself is illegal: ITAT Surat
Income Tax

Revision order u/s. 263 quashed as order passed in original proceeding itself is illegal: ITAT Surat

POONAM GANDHI2 years ago
Income TaxProfits estimated at 10% of contractual receipts hence no separate disallowance u/s. 40A(3) or 40(a)(ia) warranted: ITAT Chennai
Income Tax

Profits estimated at 10% of contractual receipts hence no separate disallowance u/s. 40A(3) or 40(a)(ia) warranted: ITAT Chennai

POONAM GANDHI2 years ago