This write-up is all about the key amendments introduced by the Hon’ble CBDT vide Notification No. 60 dated 13.08.2020 and Notification No. 61 dated 13.08.2020 modifying the earlier ‘E-assessment Scheme, 2019’ notified on 12.09.2019 and highlights of scheme.
The issue under consideration is whether order passed by the AO held that the draft order framed under Section 144C(1) of the Income Tax Act is in the name of a non-existent company is sustainable in law?
The issue under consideration is whether the serving of assessment order by uploading it on web portal and not communicated separately to the assessee will be considered as valid under law?
whether the liability of a guarantor of a debt of a corporate debtor stands reduced/extinguished upon an Insolvency Resolution Plan in respect of the corporate debtor, being approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016?”
The issue under consideration is whether transfer pricing adjustment as notional interest and charging it to tax, disregarding the provisions of Article 11 of India Cyprus DTAA is justified in law?
The issue under consideration is whether the issue of notice u/s 153C instead of section 153A is considered as valid assessment or not?
ITAT states that, anyhow disallowing 10% of the expenditure on the ground that profit leakage has to be plugged cannot be supported. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, some disallowance of a random amount of 5 lakhs, in our view, would meet the end of justice. In the result, the balance disallowance is deleted and the appeal of the assessee is allowed in part.
ACIT Vs Volvo Auto (India) Private Limited (ITAT Delhi) The issue under consideration is whether CIT(A)is correct in deleting the addition made on application of CUP method for determination of ALP of international transactions by the A.O.? ITAT states that, the AO’s observation that this expenditure has been debited to the profit and loss account […]
The issue under consideration is whether the penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) issued to the assessee who has taxed his income as per provision of section 115JB pr 115JC is justified in law?
whether the department is entitled to seize a consignment of perishable goods in transit more particularly when it is accompanied by a lawful e-way bill, invoice and when it has paid the applicable IGST?
