It is quite obvious that if the notification of CBIC i.e. Notification No. 63/2020 is to be considered as prospective only, the department or the union is accepting that the levy of interest on gross tax liability without deducing the input tax credit to taken from the electronic credit ledger available therein which is amenable to adjustment by the departmental authorities with considering the orders of the various High Courts which stayed the interest on gross levy of tax as unjust and improper.
The issue under consideration is whether the dredger is covered as a foreign flag vessel and liable for payment of custom duty?
The issue under consideration is whether the indexed cost of acquisition can be reduced for the purpose of computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Act?
CBIC notified Proviso to Section 50(1) of CGST Act, 2017 – Interest in GST to be levied on Net Tax liability w.e.f September 1, 2020 and on Gross Liability till 31st August 2020. Section 50 of CGST Act 2017 was amended by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 (23 of 2019) by inserting a proviso to […]
The issue under consideration is whether the assessee being employee of Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) and Nationalised Banks treated as government employee for the purpose of exemption u/s (10AA)(i)?
The issue under consideration is whether the equalisation levy will be applicable in case of Mastercard Asia or not?
Atos India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The issue under consideration is whether the assessment initiated in the name of a non-existing entity is justified in law? ITAT states that, even after the learned DRP taking into account the fact of merger and passing order by giving directions to the learned AO in the […]
The issue under consideration is whether the marketing expenditure incurred on account of issuance of handsets on free of cost basis is allowed as business expense or not?
The issue under consideration is whether the re-opening of assessment u/s 147 of the Act is justified in law?
whether Resolution Plans submitted after the expiry of deadline without obtaining any CoC resolution to extend the deadline and issuing notice for inviting EoI from other potential resolution applicants is justified in law?
