Ministry of Finance Recommendations of the 42nd GST Council Meeting Posted On: 05 OCT 2020 The 42nd GST Council met under the Chairmanship of Union Finance & Corporate Affairs Minister Smt Nirmala Sitharaman through video conferencing here today. The meeting was also attended by Union Minister of State for Finance & Corporate Affairs Shri Anurag […]
The issue under consideration is whether the lower authority is correct in stating that the appellant is not entitled to avail credit of duty paid on inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods since they have cleared the said exempted goods for export outside India?
The issue under consideration is whether the penalty u/s 271C levied due to failure to deduct tax at source (TDS) on LTA paid to employee is justified in law?
Wipro Limited Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Bangalore) Claim of depreciation on software- Depreciation claimed by the assessee on the amount of software capitalized was disallowed invoking provisions of section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source. Held, depreciation is a statutory allowance and hence it cannot be considered as expenditure. Accordingly, disallowance of depreciation cannot […]
The issue under consideration is whether deduction can be claimed under Research and Development (R&D) for Amount incurred towards development on a mechanism to produce customised products?
The issue under consideration is whether mere inadequacy of an enquiry or insufficiency of material on record can be a ground to invoke revisional powers u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
In the instant case, petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner’s revision of returns for the year 2017-18 as per the provisions of DVAT Act and Rules.
Continuum Wind Energe (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (Madras High Court) Conclusion: Amount paid towards the premium for hedging foreign exchange fluctuations was capital loss as exchange difference was required to be capitalized because liability had been incurred by assessee for the purpose of acquiring fixed asset namely plant and machinery. Held: Assessee had file […]
The decision holding that the payments made for purchase of software was in the nature of royalty came to be pronounced on 15.10.2011. Accordingly, assessee could not be treated as an assessee in default for not deducting TDS under section 195 in respect of payments made for purchase of licensed software prior to 15.10.2011.
The issue under consideration is whether the assessee would be entitled for deduction u/s 54F if construction of house is commenced prior to the transfer of the asset?
