Will banks be required to maintain specified securities for the amount received in TLTRO in HTM book at all times? Yes. The banks will have to maintain amount of specified securities for the amount received in TLTRO in its HTM book at all times till maturity of TLTRO.
Madras High Court states that Notice for Anti-Profiteering Investigation can’t be issued without a report of Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) followed by the order of the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA).
The issue under consideration is that despite the admitted successful filing of Form TRAN-1 by the Petitioner, the request of the Petitioner for transitioning of credit has not been approved by the ITGRC merely on the basis that there were no technical glitches on the GSTN side is justified in law?
1. e-Invoice System is enabled on Trial sites ( for APIs & Offline tools) for taxpayers with PAN based turnover more than Rs. 100 Cr. in a financial year (https://einv-apisandbox.nic.in , https://einvoice1-trial.nic.in). e-Invoice API Access Mechanism Tax Payers with Aggregate Turnover of Company more than Rs. 500 Crores Tax Payers with Aggregate Turnover of […]
Vide Notification No 80/2020 dated 28.10.2020 CBIC extends the due date u/s 44 of CGST Act 2017 for filing of Annual Return (FORM GSTR-9/GSTR-9A) and Reconciliation Statement (FORM GSTR-9C) for Financial Year 2018-19 from 31st October 2020 to 31st December, 2020. Ministry Of Finance (Department Of Revenue) (Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs) Notification […]
Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (Madras High Court) (a) The scheme of the Act contained in Section 11B of the Act read with other relevant provisions of the Central Excise Act as it then prevailed before the introduction of GST regime with effect from 1 July 2017, with regard […]
DCIT Vs Paresh K. Shah (ITAT Mumbai) Conclusion: Since the date of initiation of search u/s 132 for the purpose of an assessment u/s 153C had to be construed as the date of receiving the books of account by the AO having jurisdiction over such other person, from the A.O. of the searched person, the […]
The issue under consideration is whether AO is correct in making addition for royalty on account of alleged royalty taxable under section 9 (l)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Article 12(3) of India Switzerland Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA)?
The issue under consideration is whether the addition made by AO u/s 14A read with rule 8D is justified in law? Respectfully following the precedent, ITAT set-aside the impugned order on this score and order to delete the disallowance.
Surana Enterprises Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The issue under consideration is whether the addition made by AO u/s 69C by considering the purchases as Bogus Purchase is justified in law? ITAT states that, in present case, the assessee has shown sales of the goods, or otherwise the goods are lying in the closing stock. If […]
