Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dinesh Chand Vs ITO (ITAT Dehradun)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Dinesh Chand Vs ITO (ITAT Dehradun) Poplar Tree Sale Accepted, 115BBE Not Applicable – ITAT Dehradun Grants Partial Relief on Demonetisation Deposits Assessee had deposited ₹35 lakh in cash during the demonetisation period, which AO treated as unexplained money u/s 69A since no return or explanation was filed. CIT(A) partly accepted Assessee’s explanation and confirmed addition of ₹22 lakh. Before ITAT, Assessee produced a certificate from Revenue Authorities showing existence & sale of Poplar Trees grown on family land and claimed ₹15 lakh from such sale. He also explained ₹3....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031