Case Law Details
Case Name : Wudstay Travels Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Wudstay Travels Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Delhi ITAT quashed reassessment u/s 147/148, holding that approval beyond 3 years must come from Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General, not from a mere Principal Commissioner.
Assessee had not filed return for A.Y. 2017-18. Based on information about time deposits & interest income, AO issued notice u/s 148A(b) on 01-06-2022 and framed assessment adding ₹3.10 crore u/s 69 along with minor additions. ITAT noted that the sanction for reopening was obtained only from the Principal Commissioner, though notice was issue...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

