Follow Us:
  2. Corporate Law
  3. Judiciary

Karnataka HC Upholds Full Pension Withdrawal for Ex-Manager Over ₹300 Crore Manual LoC Misconduct

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subraya Hegde Vs Canara Bank (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts Karnataka High Court
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Subraya Hegde Vs Canara Bank (Karnataka High Court) ₹300 Crore Manual LoC Blunder- Karnataka HC Backs Canara Bank’s Full Pension Cut for Ex-Chief Manager’s Grave Misconduct; Grave Misconduct Justifies Complete Pension Cut Even Without Conviction, Rules Karnataka High Court; Karnataka HC: Post-Retirement Disciplinary Action Valid Under Canara Bank Regulations; Bank Can Withhold Entire Pension for Grave Misconduct, Board Consultation Not Needed: Karnataka HC The Appellant, a retired Chief Manager of Canara Bank’s Deccan Gymkhana Branch (Pune), challenged the Single Judge’s decision uph...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Tags:

Kindly Refer to Privacy Policy & Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

Author Bio

Name: CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka, India
Member Since: 17 Feb 2018 | Total Posts: 5443
CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore: Mere Write-off of Bad Debt is Sufficient After TRF Ltd.; AO Must Verify Only Section 36(2) Conditions ITAT Lucknow: Ad Hoc Disallowance Without Pinpointing Defects Unsustainable; GST/TDS Late Fee Held Compensatory and Remanded for Fresh Examination ITAT Raipur: Bogus LTCG Addition on Penny Stock Cannot Survive Without Evidence Linking Assessee to Price Manipulation or Entry Operators ITAT Raipur: Assessee Cannot Be Denied Section 115BAB Benefit Due to Department’s Internal Allocation of Appeal Between JCIT(A) and CIT(A) CIT(A) Must Decide Jurisdiction Before Remanding Reassessment to AO: ITAT Raipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

View All Posts

Featured Posts

View All Featured Posts

Popular Posts

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031