Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Mangilal Padamchand (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Mangilal Padamchand (Karnataka High Court) Karnataka HC to Revenue: Final means Final — You can’t reopen closed cases just because the law changed later- HC Dismisses Revenue’s Plea Seeking Recall of ITAT Order Based on Later Supreme Court Ruling in Checkmate Services The Karnataka High Court dismissed the Revenue’s writ petition challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s order dated 16.06.2023, which had refused to condone delay & entertain the Department’s miscellaneous application filed to rectify its earlier order for AY 2018-19. The Revenue had filed a rectifi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Patna ITAT: Interest on Delayed Payment of Sales Tax, Service Tax & Employer’s PF Contribution Allowable; TDS Interest Not Deductible Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031