Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Maruti Brokerage House Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Maruti Brokerage House Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) CIT(A) Passed Ex-Parte Order Without Considering Facts – ITAT Restores Client Code Modification Case for Fresh Hearing AO alleged that the Assessee booked contrived losses through client code modification (CCM) on the NMCE exchange platform & disallowed losses of ₹82,26,525 (AY 2010-11) & ₹22,71,615 (AY 2011-12). The addition was based solely on an investigation wing report, which was never confronted to Assessee. Assessee did not appear before CIT(A), leading to an ex-parte dismissal of the appeal & confirmation of the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930