Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Umesh Babu Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Umesh Babu Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed – Tribunal Limits Addition to Peak Credit- Cash Withdrawals & Re-Deposits – Tribunal Rules Only Peak Credit Taxable- Bang Trib In this case, Assessee was a non-filer, but the department found cash deposits of ₹57.10 lakhs in his savings account with a Co-operative Bank. Based on this information, a notice u/s 148 was issued & the case was reopened u/s 147. In response, Assessee filed return declaring income of ₹7.88 lakhs. AO, however, noticed that total credits were ₹92.32 lakhs including cash deposits o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031