Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Haribhai Shankarbhai Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Haribhai Shankarbhai Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Assessee did not file return for AY 2018-19. AO noticed cash deposits of ₹2.30 crore in Co-op Bank & reopened case u/s 148 on 26.05.2022. In response, Assessee filed return declaring income of ₹2,93,080/-. AO completed reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B on 20.09.2023, estimating turnover at ₹1.17 crore & applying net profit @7%, determining income at ₹8,21,178/-. Before CIT(A), appeal was filed with delay of 101 days. CIT(A) dismissed appeal in limine, refusing to condone delay. Before Tribunal, AR argued that delay was for r...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930