Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kanika Sardana (Legal Heir of Late Arjun Dev) Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kanika Sardana (Legal Heir of Late Arjun Dev) Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Dead Men Tell No Tales- CIT(A) Order Quashed as Passed Against Dead Person – Matter Restored for Legal Heir AO had framed assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 263 on 31.03.2022 for AY 2011-12. Against this, an appeal was filed before NFAC/CIT(A)), which came to be decided vide order dated 06.03.2025. However, it was an admitted fact that Assessee had expired on 14.10.2023, well before the order of CIT(A). Despite this, the NFAC proceeded ex-parte & passed the order for “non-prosecution” in the name of the deceased. The legal heir...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031