Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ankit Chauhan Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ankit Chauhan Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Substance over form -Milk Dealer only a Commission Agent, Not Liable for Audit- Reasonable Cause Saves Assessee–- ITAT Delhi Quashes 271B Penalty Delhi ITAT has deleted the penalty of ₹1,37,285 levied u/s 271B on an authorized dealer of Amul Milk, holding that there was reasonable cause for Assessee ’s failure to conduct a tax audit u/s 44AB. Assessee had filed his return declaring an income of Rs 2,49,466 for AY 2017-18. His case was selected for scrutiny due to large cash deposits. During assessment, it was explained that daily sales proceeds were depo...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031