Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 14A Disallowance Invalid Without Exempt Income: ITAT Ahmedabad

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 4100
Case Name
DCIT Vs N.K. Industries Ltd (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2010-11 & 2013-14
Advertisement


DCIT Vs N.K. Industries Ltd (ITAT Ahmedabad)

ITAT Ahmedabad held that disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act is called off in absence of any exempt income earned/ claimed. Thus, appeal of the assessee allowed and disallowance u/s. 14A set aside.

Facts- Vide the present appeal the appellant/ assessee has contested addition on account of trading transactions on NSEL platform and loss incurred at Rs. 14,42,91,136/-. Notably, AO treated the same as speculative loss and CIT(A) upheld the action of AO. Further, assessee has also contested disallowance u/s. 14A of the Income Tax Act.

Conclusion- Held that the relevant purchase and sales transactions were entered into by the assessee-company in order to avail the funds and, therefore, the loss incurred in the said transactions actually represented cost of such funds which was a business loss. The adverse inference drawn by the learned CIT(A) against the assessee on the basis of withdrawal of such loss partly was also not correct as the reasons for such withdrawal proposed by the assessee were duly explained and the fact that the assessee-company by entering into these transactions had availed finance for the purpose of business was duly established. As regards the applicability of TDS provision, the learned Counsel for the assessee has pointed out from the relevant details of transactions that the sale proceeds were received by the assessee-company from different entities while payment towards the purchase was made towards different entities. The cost of finance thus was not paid to the party from whom the finance was actually availed and the applicability of TDS, therefore, was not warranted. Moreover, the cost incurred by the assessee for availing finance was not strictly in the nature of interest and the party selling the goods having offered the same for taxation, there is no obligation of deduction of tax at source by the assessee. Having regard to all these facts of the case, we are of the view that the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the learned CIT(A) on account of alleged speculation loss is not sustainable.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.