Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Custom Duty

Fresh Ruling Cannot Be Issued as Similar Matter is Pending Before Delhi HC: CAAR

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 2395
Case Name
In re Sarveshwari Industries (CAAR Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

In re Sarveshwari Industries (CAAR Mumbai)

Sarveshwari Industries applied to the Customs Authority for Advance Rulings (CAAR) in Mumbai, seeking a ruling on the classification of “Scented Sweet Supari” under CTH 21069030. The application was filed under Section 28-H of the Customs Act, 1962. However, it was brought to the CAAR’s attention during a personal hearing that a similar case involving M/s Bag Industries, which had resulted in a ruling by the same authority, was currently under review by the Delhi High Court. Furthermore, the High Court had issued a stay order on the operation of that ruling.

Given the pending litigation and the High Court’s stay order, the CAAR determined that issuing a fresh ruling on Sarveshwari Industries’ application would be inappropriate. Section 28-I (2) of the Customs Act, 1962, prohibits the authority from issuing rulings on matters already pending before a court. Adhering to judicial discipline, the CAAR decided to refrain from issuing a ruling in this instance. The applicant was informed that they could reapply to the authority once the Delhi High Court had reached a final decision on the M/s Bag Industries case, should they still desire a ruling. Consequently, the CAAR disposed of the application without issuing a ruling.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 19,764

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.