Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Orissa HC Allows GST Registration Revocation on Payment

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 1256
Case Name
Sushri Traders Vs Additional Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax (Orissa High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Sushri Traders Vs Additional Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax (Orissa High Court)

In Sushri Traders vs. Additional Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax, the Orissa High Court addressed the cancellation of the petitioner’s GST registration under the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner challenged the cancellation order, expressing willingness to pay all outstanding dues, including tax, interest, late fees, and penalties, to reinstate registration. The delay in filing the revocation application was a key issue, with the petitioner seeking condonation based on a similar case, Mohanty Enterprises v. Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha.

The Court referred to its previous decision in Mohanty Enterprises, where it had condoned delays in invoking Rule 23 of the OGST Rules, allowing revocation applications if all dues were cleared. Applying the same reasoning, the Court granted the petitioner an opportunity to revive the GST registration upon fulfilling financial obligations and procedural compliance. The decision balances compliance requirements with business continuity while ensuring that tax dues are settled. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of, reaffirming the Court’s consistent approach to GST registration revocation matters.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF ORISSA HIGH COURT

1. Mr. Mohanty, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, under challenge is show cause notice dated 6th February, 2024 followed by order dated 11th March, 2024 cancelling his client’s registration under Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. He submits, his client is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid for the return form of his client to be accepted by the department. He relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) no.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others). He submits, his client’s claim to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 19,987

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.