This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Non-access to GST portal resulted into non-response to GST notice hence directed to deposit 25% of disputed tax
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Murugan Typewriting Institute Vs Deputy Commissioner (CT) (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Murugan Typewriting Institute Vs Deputy Commissioner (CT) (Madras High Court)
Madras High Court held that assessee is directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax amount since the assessee was unable to access GST portal and respond to the notice issued. Accordingly, appeal disposed of.
Facts- The petitioner is engaged in the services of teaching typewriting and is a registered person under the Goods and Services Act, 2017. During the relevant period, the petitioner filed its return and paid the appropriate However, during the scrutiny of the petitioner’s return, it was found that there w...





