Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ravi Auto Ltd. Vs Surana Mercantiles Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ravi Auto Ltd. Vs Surana Mercantiles Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) NCLAT Delhi held that since other materials on record prove the disbursement of amount and default, non-stamping of promissory note is inconsequential and could not be a reason to reject Section 7 application. Accordingly, appeal allowed. Facts- The Financial Creditor disbursed an amount of Rs.1,00,00,000/- to the Corporate Debtor on 01.11.2016. A Promissory Note was also executed by the Corporate Debtor on 01.11.2016. The disbursement of Rs.1,00,00,000/- was also reflected in the ledger entry of the Financial Creditor. Corporate Deb...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Tags:

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930