This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 154 Rectification Order Renders Penalty Proceedings Inconsequential: Bombay HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kusharaj Madhav Bhandary Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Kusharaj Madhav Bhandary Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)
In the case of Kusharaj Madhav Bhandary vs. ITO, the Bombay High Court reviewed an appeal by the petitioner, a salaried individual, regarding his 2017-18 income tax assessment. The issue began when Bhandary’s employer deducted ₹26,43,323 as TDS, shown in his Form 16 and Form 26AS. Despite this, the Income Tax Department’s assessment order, issued on March 30, 2022, failed to account for the TDS, resulting in an inflated tax liability and an interest charge of ₹29,00,303. Additionally, a demand of ₹55,43,799 was raised, followed ...
Author Info
