Case Law Details
Smt. Laltanpuii Vs Union of India (Meghalaya High Court)
In a landmark decision, the Meghalaya High Court directed the Customs Commissioner to refund Rs. 60 lakhs to Smt. Laltanpuii for the destruction of seized betel nuts. This judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to legal procedures and the rights of individuals in cases of seized goods. The case has seen multiple appeals and decisions from the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), the Meghalaya High Court, and the Supreme Court of India, leading to a final resolution in favor of the petitioner.
Detailed Analysis
The case revolves around the seizure of 32 metric tons of betel nuts from the petitioner, Smt. Laltanpuii, on October 28, 2017. The petitioner sought provisional release of the goods under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962, but this request was denied. The petitioner then appealed to the CESTAT, Kolkata, which set aside the seizure on December 9, 2020. This decision was upheld by the Meghalaya High Court on October 28, 2021, and the Supreme Court on October 31, 2022.
Despite these rulings, the Customs Commissioner did not implement the orders, and the seized betel nuts were destroyed during the pre-trial stage. Consequently, the petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a refund of the value of the seized goods.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
