Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Remedy cannot be availed under writ jurisdiction when alternate remedies not availed efficaciously

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2024 taxguru.in 2766
Case Name
Rajesh Kumar Dubey through proprietor Rajesh Kumar Dubey Vs Union of India (Patna High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Rajesh Kumar Dubey through proprietor Rajesh Kumar Dubey Vs Union of India (Patna High Court)

The Hon’ble Patna High Court in the case of Rajesh Kumar Dubey v. Union of India [CWJ Case No. 5113 of 2024 dated April 23, 2024] dismissed the writ petition and held that remedy cannot be availed under writ jurisdiction when the alternate remedies have not been availed efficaciously.

Facts:

Rajesh Kumar Dubey (“the Petitioner”) filed a writ petition against the appellate order dated January 9, 2024 (“the Impugned Order”) which was rejected on the ground that there was delay in filing of the appeal. The appeal was filed by the Petitioner against the order dated August 16, 2019, (“the Order”) for cancellation of GST registration.

Issue:

Whether remedy can be availed under writ jurisdiction when alternate remedies have not been availed efficaciously?

Held:

The Hon’ble Patna High Court in the case of CWJ Case No. 5113 of 2024 held as under:

  • Observed that, Section 107 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the BGST Act”) states that the appeal has to be filed within the period of three months and apply for condonation of delay with satisfactory reasons within a further period of one month.
  • Further observed that, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of In Re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation [Suo Moto Writ Petition (C) No. 3 of 2020] wherein the limitation was saved for period between March 15, 2020 to February 28, 2022. Further, the appeal could be filed within ninety days from March 1, 2022.
  • Noted that, the appeal has to be filed against order on or before May 30, 2022 but the appeal was filed November 25, 2023 after about one year and five months from the date on which even the extended limitation period expired.
  • Opined that, the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution is not to be invoked in case where there are alternate remedies available and the Assessee has not been diligent in availing such alternate remedies within the stipulated period of time.
  • Held that, the writ petition is dismissed.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF PATNA HIGH COURT

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

Bimal Jain
Name: Bimal Jain
Qualification: LL.B / Advocate
Company: A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Location: Delhi, Delhi
Articles Published: 2,901

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.