Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

If recipient has paid tax, no demand under section 201(1) should be enforced

Case Law Details

Case Name
Canara Bank Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2020-21
Advertisement
Canara Bank Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) The recent appeal filed by Canara Bank against the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT) before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai sheds light on the complexities surrounding the rectification of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) demands. The appeal, stemming from an order dated 21-08-2023 issued by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, pertains to the assessment year 2020-21. The crux of the matter revolves around the challenge to a demand of Rs. 1,64,95,826/- under section 200A for short deduction of TDS on interest payments made t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 17,290

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *