Metal One Corporation India Pvt. Ltd Vs Union Of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court)
Delhi High Court’s interim relief to Metal One Corp. by staying GST Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) show cause notices. Analysis of tax liability on salaries paid to seconded employees.
Introduction: The Delhi High Court has granted relief to Metal One Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. by staying the show cause notices (SCNs) demanding ₹3.09 Crores under GST Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM). The dispute revolves around the tax liability on salaries paid to seconded employees from its holding company. Let’s explore the details of the case and the court’s interim decision.
Detailed Analysis:
1. Background of the Case:
- Metal One Corporation faces SCNs proposing a GST demand of ₹3.09 Cr on RCM for supplies from its holding company.
- The controversy arises from payments made to seconded employees, treated as salaries, and the applicability of IGST on RCM.
2. Petitioner’s Response:
- Metal One Corporation challenges the assumption that secondment of employees constitutes a supply subject to tax.
- The petitioner asserts that payments to expatriate employees are made under separate employment contracts and not for the supply of services by the holding company.
3. Legal Standpoint:
- The respondents rely on the Supreme Court’s decision in C.C.,E., & ST., Bangalore v. Northern Operating Systems Pvt. Ltd., arguing similarities in the payment structure.
- Metal One Corporation distinguishes the case, emphasizing the foreign company’s role as the employer and the absence of separate contracts in the cited case.
4. Court’s Interim Decision:
Paid content
Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.
