Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Supreme court disallows SLP, where alternative remedy not exercised by assessee

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2023 taxguru.in 5287
Case Name
Vishwanath Traders Vs Union Of India & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Vishwanath Traders Vs Union Of India & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)

In a pivotal decision, the Hon’ble Supreme Court recently upheld the judgment of the Hon’ble Patna High Court in the case of M/s. Vishwanath Traders v. Union of India & Ors. [Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15594 of 2023 dated August 04, 2023] . The judgment highlights the significance of exercising alternate remedies available to an assessee and the consequences of not doing so diligently.

Hon’ble Supreme Court upheld the order of the Hon’ble Patna High Court wherein the high court held that extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India cannot be invoked where assessee has alternate remedies available and he was not diligent in availing such alternate remedies within the stipulated time.

Facts:

M/s. Vishwanath Traders (“the Petitioner”) aggrieved by the Assessment order dated March 12, 2022 passed by the Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) filed an appeal before the Appellant Authority.

The Appellate Authority vide an Order dated October 17, 2022 (“the Appellate Order”) dismissed the appeal and stated that as per Section 107 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the BGST Act”) an appeal can be filed within three months from the date of which the said decision or order is communicated to such person. Moreover, after taking into account the saving of limitation granted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No. 3 of 2020. The Petitioner would have filed an appeal on or before May 29, 2022. However, the Petitioner filed appeal on August 08, 2022 with a delay of two months nineteen days from the date on which even the limitation period as stipulated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, expired.

Aggrieved by the Appellate Order the Petitioner filed writ before the Hon’ble Patna High Court, The High Court dismissed the writ by stating that they do not find any reason to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India, especially when the Petitioner had alternate remedies available and the Petitioner was not diligent in availing such alternate remedies within the stipulated time.

Aggrieved by the Order of the Hon’ble Patna High Court the Petitioner filed SLP before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

Held:

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15594 of 2023 held as under:

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

Bimal Jain
Name: Bimal Jain
Qualification: LL.B / Advocate
Company: A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Location: Delhi, Delhi
Articles Published: 2,897

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.