Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Lalman Yadav Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Lalman Yadav Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi held that presumption u/s. 132(4A) of the Income Tax Act is only against the person in whose possession the search material is found and not against any other person. Addition based on dumb documents without corroborative evidence is unsustainable in law. Facts- A search & Seizure operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was conducted in different business and residential premises of Rathi Group of cases based at Delhi and National Capital Region (NCR). The case of the assessee was also found to be covered in the search. Various incriminati...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930