This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Rules: Income Determination Based on Surmise and Conjecture is Illegal
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Vinod Kumar Bajaj (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
DCIT Vs Vinod Kumar Bajaj (ITAT Delhi)
Introduction: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) of Delhi recently issued a significant ruling in the case of DCIT Vs Vinod Kumar Bajaj, where it declared the act of determining income based purely on conjecture and presumption as grossly illegal. The case revolved around an addition made to Bajaj’s income by the Assessing Officer (AO) based on an internal email conversation, which the AO considered as evidence of undisclosed income from election consultancy services.
Analysis: In this case, the AO presumed that Bajaj had prov...





