This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 68: AO Not Obligated for Further Inquiries till Assessees Fulfill Initial Onus
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Sri Endarsh Investment & Finance Pvt (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2009-10
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ITO Vs Sri Endarsh Investment & Finance Pvt (ITAT Delhi)
In a noteworthy decision by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi, the case of the Income Tax Officer (ITO) Vs Sri Endarsh Investment & Finance Pvt revolved around an important legal provision, section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The case shed light on the responsibility of the assessee in terms of unexplained share application money.
Analysis: The matter in question was whether the CIT(A) was correct in deleting the addition of Rs.18 crores made by the AO on account of unexplained share application money under section 68...
