This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CC accepts apology offered by ITO for not following principle of judicial discipline
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Deccan Holdings B V Vs ITO (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Deccan Holdings B V Vs ITO (Delhi High Court)
Mr. Shashi Bhushan Sharma, the Income Tax Officer, who had passed the impugned order, is personally present in court today. He admits that the observations/findings in the impugned order that the judgments passed by this court in Steria (India) Ltd. Vs. CIT, (2016) 386 ITR 390 (Del), EPCOS Electric Components S.A. Vs. Union of India, (2019) 266 Taxman 23 (Delhi) and M/s Concentrix Services Netherlands B.V., 434 ITR 516 ‘are not acceptable to him’ are untenable in law. He further admits that principle of judicial discipline mand...
