This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Mere Common ownership not sufficient to prove Bid-Rigging: CCI
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- XYZ (Confidential) Vs. Continental Milkose India Limited (Competition Commission of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
XYZ (Confidential) Vs. Continental Milkose India Limited (Competition Commission of India)
Mere commonality of ownership does not imply contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(d) of the Act, unless there is material on record to substantiate the allegations of bid rigging by way of collusion.
Contention of the Complainant
The Informant has alleged anti-competitive practices of cartelisation led by Continental Milkose India Limited and M/s KAG Industries in respect of tenders invited by the Army Purchase Organization (APO), Quarter Master General Branch, Integrated Head Quarters, India...
