This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
IBC 2016: Suspended Board of Director’ cannot displace a ‘Resolution Professional’
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Anil Kumar Ojha Vs Chandramouli Ramasubramaniam Resolution Professional of SLO Industrial Ltd. & Anr. (NCLAT)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCLAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Anil Kumar Ojha Vs Chandramouli Ramasubramaniam Resolution Professional of SLO Industrial Ltd. & Anr. (NCLAT, Chennai)
Section 27 of I & B Code specifies that a ‘Resolution Professional’ may be replaced/displaced at any time during ‘CIRP’ by the ‘Committee of Creditors’, by a 66% majority of voting shares, subject to a written consent of the proposed ‘Resolution Professional’. The ‘desires’ of majority of ‘Creditors’ is to be given weight. Undoubtedly, the ‘Committee of Creditors’ do have the right to displace a ‘Resolution Professional’. Section 27 of t...
