Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s Shree Krishna Vatika Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12 to 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
M/s Shree Krishna Vatika Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur) From the record we also found that the assessee had attended the proceedings under the bonafide belief that the losses as claimed (which was same in both returns filed u/s 139(1) and 153A) were duly being assessed by the AO, and this intention of the AO to treat the current year loss of the assessee as its additional income was never intimated during the assessment proceeding. Rather it was noticed only when the assessment order was received, thus no opportunity was ever granted to explain the issue during the course of ass...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. GadsAmit says:

    Hi

    I filed my ITR2 return on 24th Dec 2020 (AY 20-21). I filled in Schedule 112A, Schedule CFL and sheet “Part B – TI – TTI” point 16 correctly shows current year losses to be carried forward. However, the acknowledgement I received (after e-verification) shows current year losses as 0?!

    Please can you help confirm why that may have happened and how can I correct it?

    Thanks

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930