This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Mere non-production of proof for dispatch of documents does not entail disallowance
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Malineni Babulu (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2009-10
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Brief of the Case: In the case of Malineni Babulu (HUF) vs ITO, ITAT Hyderabad inter-alia held that the appellant failed to produce proof in support of dispatch of Form 15H to the CIT, this by itself does not entail any addition. It was only technical breach of law and the act provides for separate penal provisions for such default. Therefore, no disallowance can be made under the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act.
Facts of the Case: The appellant was a HUF. The return of income for the AY. 2009-10 was filed on 30-09-2009 declaring net income of Rs.2,35,000/-. As against this retu...
