Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Section 132- No Punishment under GST without Assessment: HC

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2019 taxguru.in 898
Case Name
M/s. Jayachandran Alloys (P) Ltd. Vs The Superintendent of GST and Central Excise (Madras High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

M/s. Jayachandran Alloys (P) Ltd. Vs Superintendent of GST and Central Excise (Madras High Court)

In the present case, the Department does not dispute that action was intended or envisaged in the light of Section 132 of the CGST Act, the counter fairly stating that the provisions of Section 132 of the CGST Act were ‘shown’ to the Assessee. There is thus no doubt in my mind that the Department intended to intimidate the petitioner with the possibility of punishment under 132 and this action is contrary to the scheme of the Act. While the activities of an assessee contrary to the scheme of the Act are liable to be addressed swiftly and effectively by the Department, (the statute in question being a revenue statute where strict interpretation is the norm), officials cannot be seen to be acting in excess of the authority vested in them under the statute. I am of the considered view that the power to punish set out in Section 132 of the Act would stand triggered only once it is established that an assessee has ‘committed’ an offence that has to necessarily be post-determination of the demand due from an assessee, that itself has to necessarily follow the process of an assessment.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGMENT

The petitioner is an Assessee before the respondent authorities, in terms of the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, (in short ‘CGST Act’). The CGST Act was implemented with effect from 01.07.2017 and provides for the assessment of turnover from sales and services as enumerated therein. Regular monthly returns have been filed by the petitioner and this is not disputed.

2. While this was so, there appears to have been an investigation initiated by the respondents in the premises of the petitioner, commencing from 15.10.2018 and continuing on various dates thereafter. Seizures of voluminous documents and records have been effected. The petitioner has also been called upon to furnish various records and has done so, under letters dated 17.11.2018 and 22.11.2018.

3. The list of documents submitted on 17.11.2018 is set out below:-

‘JAYACHANDRAN ALLOYS PVT LTD
Following Original / Documents submitted to GST HPU Officers dt: 17/11/2018

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.