Case Law Details
Case Name : Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. Vs CIT (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 1996-97
Courts :
All High Courts Kerala High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. Vs CIT (Kerala High Court)
Conclusion: Deduction under section 35D for amortisation of preliminary expenses in connection with the issue of shares for public subscription was allowable to assessee bank extending financial services.
Held: AO denied deduction under section 35D on the ground that assessee was a bank extending financial services and not an industrial undertaking therefore, it would not be entitled to amortisation of preliminary expenses in connection with the issue of shares for public subscription. It was held the manner in which the “industrial undertaki...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
