This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Attachment of bank A/cs U/s. 226(3) not justified as dept already recovered more than 15% of disputed demand
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sesa Resources Ltd. Vs. Asst. CIT & Ors. (Bombay High Court At Goa Bench)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Sesa Resources Ltd. Vs. Asst. CIT & Ors. (Bombay High Court At Goa Bench)
We have heard the submissions of the learned counsel and we have also gone through the records. For the reasons stated in the said judgment of this Court in the case of Andrew Communications India (P) Ltd. (supra) and as it is not in dispute that the facts therein are identical to the facts in the present case, we have no reason to take a contrary view in the present petition. Admittedly, 15 per cent of the disputed amount has already been recovered by the respondent-Revenue and such amount is cove...
